Should Israel ban fur trade?
Selected Version - Version 4 (Current Version) : 26 Mar 2010 | 10:05 | Jessica Elgot
All versions
Key
- Text coloured Greenhas been added snce the previous version
- Text marked
red and striked-throughhas been deleted
|
Changes from Version 3 to Version 4
|
|||||||
Yes, because... Israel could do with good PR
Whisper it, Israel needs to show the world it can lead the way on humanitarian issues, that it's a good and compassionate, democratic country that we know it is. What a missed oppertunity to do some good. The fur trade is vile and inhumane, and crucially unnecessary. And now just because some Canadian had a quiet word with some Knesset members animals lose out, yet again. It's disgusting. The MK's need more backbone. We Jews are enjoined to be kind to animals. Judaism prides itself on its compassion towards them. Continuing to tolerate the fur trade belies that, degrades our fellow sensate creatures, and demeans us all. Remember, the previous owner of that fur garment - the rightful owner - was killed wearing it. If the pelt originates in China, chances are that it was obtained from animals who died in agony while being boiled alive. Repeat - boiled alive. Whether animals are farmed for their fur or are entrapped (with all the suffering that entrapment entails) is immaterial. The fur trade is barbaric and outmoded. Tolerating it is unconscionable. Israel should ban it now.
The fur trade is indeed unbelievably vile, and I hate to be a bit cynical, but given that Israel hasn't shown much signs of being a good compassionate, democratic country
Do the Israelis have any tradition of respecting anyone's rights except their own? Why would we expect them to start now? You may as well ask the Russians or the Chinese the same thing!
In Israel, we should not expect too much, I fear! For that matter, not many countries have the hallmark of these characteristics in their cultures! Of course we should not give up, but we should expect progress to be slow in most places.
